There seems
to be a lot of confusion over whether or not abstinence (orgasm
denial) causes prostate cancer in men. The reason for this confusion
is due to the fact that there has never been any conclusive data from
any medical study on the subject.
Oh, there
have been many studies done. Too many to list here, but the problem
is simply a lack of empirical data either way. The one thing the
entire medical community can agree on, concerning prostate cancer, is
that we know more about its treatment than we do about its cause.
One of the
main problems with any study of this nature rests with the honesty of
its participants. Also, running a “control” group is NOT easy.
After all, who is going to tell a bunch of grown men that are not
permitted to ejaculate for the next twelve months (or longer) while
another group will have to ejaculate several times a week? Who is
going to keep the abstinent group honest?
What we do
know is that the older you get, the better chance you have of
developing prostate cancer. Your race may (or may not) also have an
effect on that possibility. Ask any prostate researcher and he/she
can tell you more things that don't cause prostate cancer than any
that might cause it.
So, if you
are worried about putting your guy into long-term chastity, you can
always learn to milk his prostate or become very good at ruining his
orgasms. Either of these methods would be an effective prostate
cancer preventative, if it is, indeed, caused by abstinence.
Mistress
Ivey
Denial and prostate cancer are not linked. It's some stupid statistics that can prove it, if it is not so.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is, most studies that report on prostate cancer were not actually studies of prostate cancer. That is, they are usually studies of how abstinence effects the body or some such, but not specifically for prostate cancer. What few studies have been done could not find conclusive data that links prostate cancer with abstinence.
ReplyDeleteIvey